A single particle creates waves that interfere after passing through two slits.

The effect is tiny but it is here, .. or what do you think ?

Posted by sam on Apr 8, 2013 | 34 comments

A single particle creates waves that interfere after passing through two slits.

The effect is tiny but it is here, .. or what do you think ?

- sdyn on Generating uniaxial vibration with an electrodynamic shaker and external air bearing
- latest on killing copenhagen interpretation via fluid dynamics | Turing Machine on Quantumlike statistics of deterministic waveparticle interactions in a circular cavity
- Paul Bancroft on Superposition, Decoherence, Schrodinger’s Cat and other magical lies my professors told you.
- Bob on Superposition, Decoherence, Schrodinger’s Cat and other magical lies my professors told you.
- Valery on Particle–wave association on a fluid interface
- sargon on How it is done : DIY Cymatronics
- Tom Andersen on Emergent quantization in a square box
- r. on Square cavity
- heligone on Emergent quantization in a square box
- heligone on Physics Today : letters to the editor

- Bibliography (85)
- Blog (42)
- Core Bibliography (72)
- Extended Bibliography (11)
- Featured (14)
- Numerical Simulation (18)
- On the web (4)
- Original Photos (6)
- Original videos (25)
- Photos (14)
- Slider (7)
- Theory Bibliography (18)
- Thesis (7)
- Videos (32)

- Austrian Institute for Nonlinear Studies (AINS) – Gerhard Groessing
- Berkeley University – TAF LAB
- Caltech Mc Keon Research Group
- Instituto Nacional de Matemática Pura e Aplicada – Andre Nachbin and Carlos Galeano
- MIT – John BUSH
- St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute – Dr. Valeriy Sbitnev
- Università degli Studi di Palermo – Pr. Diego Molteni –
- Université de Liège – Quandrops
- Université Paris Diderot – Yves Couder
- University of Bath – PAUL MILEWSKI
- University of Cambridge – Computer Laboratory – Dr Robert Brady

- EmQm17 October 22, 2017
- Walking droplet above cavities October 17, 2017
- Faraday wave droplet dynamics : discret time analysis October 17, 2017
- Tunneling with a hydrodynamic pilot-wave model October 17, 2017
- Walking droplets in linear channels October 17, 2017
- Self-propulsion and crossing statistics under random initial conditions October 17, 2017
- A trajectory equation for walking droplets : hydrodynamic pilot-wave theory October 17, 2017
- Influence of memory on trajectory in a harmonic potential January 22, 2017
- A model for Faraday pilot waves over variable topography January 22, 2017
- Non-specular reflection of walking droplets January 22, 2017
- Self-attraction into spinning eigenstates of a mobile wave source by its emission back-reaction January 22, 2017
- Onset of chaos in orbital pilot-wave dynamics January 15, 2017
- Surface topography measurements of the bouncing droplet experiment December 4, 2016
- Momentum exchange in the electron double-slit experiment November 29, 2016
- Double-slit experiment with single wave-driven particles and its relation to quantum mechanics October 12, 2016
- New reference website from Paris Couder & Fort Team October 7, 2016
- Shedding light on pilot-wave phenomena September 17, 2016
- Neimark–Sacker bifurcation and evidence of chaos in a discrete dynamical model of walkers September 17, 2016
- Wave-Based Turing Machine: Time Reversal and Information Erasing September 17, 2016
- Transition Orbits of Walking Droplets August 15, 2016
- emergence of statistical pattern in a 1D cavity August 5, 2016
- Quantumlike statistics of deterministic waveparticle interactions in a circular cavity July 13, 2016
- Retro-influence of a square cavity on a circular standing wave May 22, 2016
- Square cavity May 22, 2016
- Rainbow colored dotwave May 22, 2016
- Dotwave picture on Phys.org May 22, 2016
- Faraday wave lattice as an elastic metamaterial May 22, 2016
- Scattering theory of walking droplets in the presence of obstacles May 22, 2016
- Nonlinear Generation of Vorticity by Surface Waves May 21, 2016
- Pilot-wave dynamics in a harmonic potential : Quantization and stability of circular orbits May 2, 2016
- Physics Today : letters to the editor April 11, 2016
- Faraday pilot wave dynamics : modelling and computation April 10, 2016
- Dynamics and statistics of wave-particle interactions in a confined geometry April 10, 2016
- Displacement of an Electrically Charged Drop on a Vibrating Bath April 10, 2016
- Emergent quantization in a square box April 5, 2016
- Mini Colloque RNL 2016 : Dualité onde-corpuscule à l’échelle macroscopique March 15, 2016
- Smoothed Particles Hydrodynamics numerical simulations of droplets walking on viscous vibrating fluid January 25, 2016
- Revisiting time reversal and holography with spacetime transformations. October 12, 2015
- Waveguides for walking droplets October 12, 2015
- Pilot-Wave Hydrodynamics (Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 2015) September 26, 2015
- On the analogy of quantum wave-particle duality with bouncing droplets September 26, 2015
- Strings of droplets propelled by coherent waves September 26, 2015
- Interaction of two walkers: Wave-mediated energy and force September 26, 2015
- Build-up of macroscopic eigenstates in a memory-based constrained system September 25, 2015
- Parametrically excited water surface ripples as ensembles of oscillons September 24, 2015
- DotWave Keynote at XLIM Lab in Limoges June 19, 2015
- Une mémoire ondulatoire : États propres, Chaos et Probabilités June 12, 2015
- The wave-induced added mass of walking droplets May 12, 2015
- Generating uniaxial vibration with an electrodynamic shaker and external air bearing May 12, 2015
- A low‑cost, precise piezoelectric droplet‑on‑demand generator May 12, 2015
- Chaos Driven by Interfering Memory May 12, 2015
- Étude d’une dynamique à mémoire de chemin: une expérimentation théorique May 12, 2015
- “Fingers and Holes in a Shaken Cornstrach Solution” sur YouTube August 17, 2014
- Birth of a dotwave (Un rebond peut en cacher un autre) August 3, 2014
- Video Lesson – 07/06/2013 – Hydrodynamic Modelling of Pilot-Wave and boucing droplet coupling in a Faraday Problem July 21, 2014
- Bouncing droplet project — single-slit diffraction July 21, 2014
- SPH Simulation of a walking droplet July 20, 2014
- Influence of a local change of depth on the behavior of bouncing oil drops July 20, 2014
- Vortex-mediated bouncing drops on an oscillating liquid July 20, 2014
- Dotwave @ 240 frame per Seconds with modified GoPro July 20, 2014

- sdyn on Generating uniaxial vibration with an electrodynamic shaker and external air bearing
- latest on killing copenhagen interpretation via fluid dynamics | Turing Machine on Quantumlike statistics of deterministic waveparticle interactions in a circular cavity
- Paul Bancroft on Superposition, Decoherence, Schrodinger’s Cat and other magical lies my professors told you.
- Bob on Superposition, Decoherence, Schrodinger’s Cat and other magical lies my professors told you.
- Valery on Particle–wave association on a fluid interface
- sargon on How it is done : DIY Cymatronics
- Tom Andersen on Emergent quantization in a square box
- r. on Square cavity
- heligone on Emergent quantization in a square box
- heligone on Physics Today : letters to the editor

- EmQm17
- Walking droplet above cavities
- Faraday wave droplet dynamics : discret time analysis
- Tunneling with a hydrodynamic pilot-wave model
- Walking droplets in linear channels
- Self-propulsion and crossing statistics under random initial conditions
- A trajectory equation for walking droplets : hydrodynamic pilot-wave theory
- Influence of memory on trajectory in a harmonic potential
- A model for Faraday pilot waves over variable topography
- Non-specular reflection of walking droplets
- Self-attraction into spinning eigenstates of a mobile wave source by its emission back-reaction
- Onset of chaos in orbital pilot-wave dynamics
- Surface topography measurements of the bouncing droplet experiment
- Momentum exchange in the electron double-slit experiment
- Double-slit experiment with single wave-driven particles and its relation to quantum mechanics

- Austrian Institute for Nonlinear Studies (AINS) – Gerhard Groessing
- Berkeley University – TAF LAB
- Caltech Mc Keon Research Group
- Instituto Nacional de Matemática Pura e Aplicada – Andre Nachbin and Carlos Galeano
- MIT – John BUSH
- St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute – Dr. Valeriy Sbitnev
- Università degli Studi di Palermo – Pr. Diego Molteni –
- Université de Liège – Quandrops
- Université Paris Diderot – Yves Couder
- University of Bath – PAUL MILEWSKI
- University of Cambridge – Computer Laboratory – Dr Robert Brady

Andersen A.
Anderson R.
Bach R.
Bastin T.
Batelaan H.
Boudaoud A.
Brady R.
Brun P. T.
Bush J. W.
Couder Y.
Decelle A.
Dorbolo S.
Eddi A.
Ellegaard C.
Faria L. M.
Feynman R.
Filoux B.
Fort E.
Galeano Rios C.
Gautier C. H
Gilet T.
Harris D. M.
Hendershott M. C.
Hubert M.
Labousse M.
Lautrup B.
Lieber S. I.
Ludewig F.
Madsen J.
Martin J.
Milewsky P.
Moisy F.
Molteni D.
Moláček J.
Moukhtar J.
Nachbin A.
Oza A. U.
Perrard S.
Protière S.
Reichelt C.
Rosales R. R.
Schlagheck P.
Terwagne D.
Vandewalle N.
Wind-Willassen Ø.

Dotwave.org is an Independant research group

You can check more

- Discussions on current research on this Facebook public page :

- videos on these youtube channels :

All photos and videos presented on this website are our own work unless mentionned otherwise, or included in the "bibliography" section.

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress

That’s it !!! Now we all know that observer has nothing to do with it 🙂 Great video heligone !!!

Yes , exactly. We all ready to accept the duality fact of particles, the problem comes because the collapse of the wave function.

Well done!

This isn’t QM

No QM. Ok is not, and ??? What is your point ???

Putting sensor on the slit or slits causes distortion of the wave, that’s why there’s no interference pattern. Sensor is NOT observer and sensor physically affects a particles !!! End of story !!!

What is your opinion heligone ?

This is a JOKE! and it has nothing to do with quantum phenomena. The waves are caused and sustained by the vibrating bath as the droplet is vibrated through one of the slits. The main point is to NOT mistake this picture with anything that goes on in quantum-land. Just as an electron doesn’t really orbit around the nucleus, a quantum particle doesn’t really “go through” either slit (even if one is closed).

Right, that”s not quantum physics, that’s just oil vibrated at the workshop. But it is also a wave-particle moving and interacting …

You’re ridiculous, the probability of the wave function and of the electron is just the statistics and cannot explain the process of the system.

Demonstrations like this one show that the probability is but one aspect of the system and is analogous to the Faraday wave mode of the potential well. These wave particles (aka walkers) operate by the same principles as quantum mechanics, such as tunneling, quantized orbits and even entanglement.

/watch?v=nmC0ygr08tE

entanglement? where is the experiment with entanglement? I heard Couder briefly talk about entanglement in his 2011 PIRSA talk but he made a comment as to the fact he couldn’t replicated entanglement (very last minutes of the talk). That was 2011, has there been something on entanglement? I mean in the Bell inequality sense?

But what is entanglement in the first place ? I mean from a real hands-on experimental point of view. What is the seminal paper on that topic ?

Why not set up an experimental setup in which you could test Bell’s theorem by creating in-phase walkers moving in opposite directions?

I am not savvy enough concerning bell’s theorem, but I’l be glad to read more about it. And what kind of setup do have in mind exactly ?

Regards,

Heligone

“A great experiment that gives us more understanding about this dynamic wave universe of only motion forever moving to find rest and balance now,..but never finding it.

Vibrating matter of opposed motion is simulating rest and balance now through violent motion is a fine mixture of positive and negative electric charges coming into and out of existence.

All forces of nature formed by the locational spherical inward absorption density + and -outward emission density now of electromagnetic waves.”

Gorgeous!

Yes, this is not quantum physics. But this hydrodynamical analogy of the quantum effect hints us how vacuum fluctuations guide a particle through a slit.

he has a point, rather than to assume that the particle goes through both slits simultaneously, sounds less plausible than the particle with a wave ahead of it and the particle goes in one slot and the wave that’s been pushed ahead goes through both slits.and aren’t all particle’s finally waves ?

yes, this is clearly the attraction of this system, that we can picture the statistics as emerging from random walks in a wavefield with memory. Of course the question of what the waves are in the case of photons (remember that here the waves travel at 10x the speed of walker) is an interesting question.

joli maniement de la litote !

man we need by now pants with 2 slits? I need money for Nobel prize to

build m thermodynamic resonant engine your spay is polarizing the atoms.

You need more ask me. Heisenberg-yes , dualism-yes but there really is

polarization in respect with Heisenberg and dualism. The observer have

sometingh to say if is active one.

please STOP pushing physic in wrong direction, When we don’t understand

something that mean , must to go to contemplation and reflect are

components of time what are offering us wisdom.

if you ask me this line of research is some of the most beautiful we have seen in years. But don’t take it from me, t’hooft just showcased this work at the emerging QM. Smolin has Couder talking at perimeter etc etc… thank god the who’s who of physics doesn’t share your opinion as to where it needs to go next. Personally I think if some of these pictures turn out to be real, couder is noble worthy.

Thanks for droping in some big names taking interest in walking droplets.

For those who don’t know :

Gerard ‘t Hooft : http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerard_'t_Hooft

Lee Smolin : http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Smolin

The old interpretation for Interference can’t to explain photon by photon Interference. Ion Murgu CUT&PT 345 Resonator can. Thanks for your words!

an “electron” is only the interaction of in and out standing waves.

everything consists of waves only.

This is a great video and on behalf of the reddit community, I would like

to ask you to upload more of them if you have some ;3

yes, I am proud you read Ion Murgu postulate in Physics

https://plus.google.com/u/0/105819717025105817298/posts/g74B5dYBwRj?pid=6032243136781954962&oid=105819717025105817298

yes, I am proud you read Ion Murgu postulate in Physics

https://plus.google.com/u/0/105819717025105817298/posts/g74B5dYBwRj?pid=6032243136781954962&oid=105819717025105817298

hopefully this will be the death knell to the juvenile idiocy called the

copenhagen interpretation and the utter lunacy of the many worlds

interpretation

Observer would be like adding another particle to the scene which would add

more waves?

That vid blows my mind!

Can I make that at home and how?

Nice video exactly what i thought it was particles interfering with

themselves =)